Fred Allebach
The
conservative oligarchy finances huge propaganda campaigns to whip up social
resentment of little white guy furor when in fact the oligarchy could give a
rat’s ass about any peons at the bottom, white or otherwise.
There
is social resentment but it’s aimed at those who should be allies while the
real enemy is a self-serving oligarchy. This has all happened before with the
Greeks, Romans etc. There is plenty of historical precedent to illustrate that
the situation we have in the US now is leading to no good. Hyper partisanship,
intractable disputes, extreme unequal distribution of wealth; this all leads to
the dissolution of society as we know it. Then we get back to a war of all
against all from which new orders emerge to start the same game all over again.
There
is a new type of citizen invoked by conservatives: “the taxpayer”. Taxpayers
are somehow separate from the population (non-white underdogs) who need good
jobs. Taxpayers are somehow exempt from being members of society with any
responsibilities other than to themselves. “Taxpayers” actually don’t want to
pay any tax at all and would prefer to have no obligations or any social
contract. The ethos is all about complete individual freedom and no social
responsibility whatsoever. Every dog for himself is basically what the
Republican platform amounts to. This is the raw, natural law of domination of
the few over the many. The roots of the ideology are clear enough to see.
What’s
happened is that the plantation Masters have managed through billion dollar
propaganda campaigns to conflate the interests of the Kings with a segment of
subjects who happen to have the same religion, color of skin and cultural
background.
Taxpayers
don’t want to pay for public union benefits primarily because they aren’t
getting any themselves. People are always acutely sensitive to who has more,
especially when they have less. (Welcome to the bottom of the pile white guys!)
Fairness issues come out pretty quickly. Part of the social resentment behind
the small government movement is the feeling that undeserving freeloaders
(“takers”, Romney’s 47%) are getting a free ride on the taxpayer’s dollar.
Yet
it is totally disingenuous of conservatives to appear to be on the side of
little guy taxpayers when in reality there is nothing there other than a
negative pronouncement against all people who are legitimately at the bottom.
Racism
and class antagonism live on. Looking closer at modern conservativism you see
the movement is focused on white people, on an appeal to little white guys who
see the economy tanking and don’t want to be lumped in with blacks, Hispanics,
immigrants, women and all the civil rights history implied therein.
This
lingering racism and class antagonism comes out as a counter-fairness argument.
It’s not fair that little white guys should pay one dollar to help any others
other than themselves. This can never be said outright but it is pretty clear
given the history of racial resentment that this is a card and a code
politicians play to win over white guys.
The
primary unfairness is unequal distribution of wealth, unequal civil rights,
citizenship, education, legal protections etc. Yet this argument doesn’t hold
water with conservatives as it goes against the primary assumption that society
is fundamentally unfair and that’s OK.
The
tax cutting and union busting movements have a similar goal, to strip the
government of the means to redistribute wealth in ways that enfranchise races
and classes who have faced structural prejudice and wage exploitation. Since
the natural order of things is to have an underclass with no rights,
conservatives take whatever tacks they can to frustrate legitimate efforts at
equality.
The
counter-fairness argument is forcefully laid out but puts nothing up for jobs
or society at large. The primary assumption is of class and race segregation
and antagonism. This is a divisive program, not a positive program looking of
the betterment of society. Todays conservative seem to be primarily against things with no actual program of their own to put
forward. For example, what instead of Obamacare? Nothing.
The
missing link here is that the Republicans have no plan at all to create jobs
other than to cut more taxes. And if that works so well where are all the jobs
after eight years of Bush? This party line just doesn’t add up. The party line
rallies the troops for more draconian cuts against the invisible, unspoken
enemy: all who are not of white, northern European ancestry. That’s right you
southern Europeans, Jews and Orientals, you are not really members of the club.
The smokescreen that “we are broke” is a thin façade for going after labor
rights and social programs that include others besides white guys. This is the
real agenda, not fiscal responsibility.
It’s
really amazing how the ideological fog machine keeps small fish Right wingers
from being able to see the Wizard. The current positional conflict has such
inertia that facts don’t matter. What matters is not backing down and volume.
Winning at any cost is the price of blind emotional conflict. Reasonable
assessments and solutions are not possible.
I’m
not advocating some kind of utopia of forced redistribution of wealth and free
hand-outs. The Gracchus brothers did that at the end of the Roman Republic and
they were murdered. I have a simple proposition: a universal fair opportunity
to a modest life with food, shelter, insurance and retirement. That’s it.
Today’s
workers are like sheep that have been split from the flock and the wolves are
having a field day. This is how “taxpayers” can be set against unions, to all the
little guy’s disadvantage. This is where Tea Party and Left disillusionment and
alienation actually have quite a bit of common ground. There just needs to be
somebody to articulate it. The enemy here is not the Left; it is the top 1%.
Deregulation
brought the current economic mess. The financial elite got their way and they
have brought the world economy to its knees and this is still not enough to see
any light as to how things really are. And now the 1% lackeys want to engage in
union busting. This is real class warfare. The fight is on. Theses top dogs
don’t discriminate between little fish who are union or not. Why “taxpayers” would be on the side big
money is beyond me; it’s against all their interests! These conservative
“taxpayers” will soon learn the meaning of a “Pyrrhic victory” when Wall Street
and the top 1% leaves them as high and dry as the unions.
The
anti-tax people do have some good points. The system is ridiculously complex
and regressive. Yet how is society to run with no income? There has to be
taxation in order to have the infrastructure upon which the economy runs. There
has to be a safety net or people become like cattle in a horrific Charles
Dickens novel. If you ask private society to care for its own, well shit, the
white guys all fled to the suburbs and nobody wants to own up to legacies of
prejudice, exploitation, racism, slavery etc. According to this formula, all
success is the result of who gets up earliest in the morning and if some have
less it is not any structural fault of society.
This
is a house of mirrors of blame and bitter retribution. Rigid positionalism
stokes the fog machine and anything close to a public, normal, reasoned
analysis is just nowhere to be found. Instead of finding a theme to unite the
downtrodden, which is where all little guys are heading, what we get is
divisive short-term politicking. The rats are fighting amongst themselves.
When
the wolves gain total control of prey, they will run things in an out of
balance regime (see allegory of Plato’s Cave) until the whole house of cards
comes down. What we have is an unsustainable, out of balance, immoral,
unvirtuous situation. Somebody, some regional leader please climb out of the
cave and shed some reasonable light on our situation!
Providence
and exceptionalism are not so self-evident now. The new financial Kings
arbitrarily rule over the new colonists right here in our own backyard; the
enemy is not unions or liberals, it’s the top 1%!
Sources
Chafe, William H., The Unfinished
Journey: America Since World War 2. New York, Oxford University Press 2007
pp. 106-107
Riccardi, Nicholas, Rust Belt at
vanguard of backlash against organized labor. Los Angeles Times 2/18/11,
accessed through Mercury News.com 2/19/11
URL: http://www.mercurynews.com/rss/ci_17428384?source=rss
Magdoff,
Fred. The Great Recession and Its
Aftermath: Causes vs, Symptoms.
URL:
mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/magdoff060211.html
Rogers,
Perry M. Aspects of Western Civilization:
Problems and Sources in History. 7th Edition. Prentice Hall,
Boston 2011 pp. 102-105
Sharp,
Gene., From Dictatorship to Democracy: A
conceptual framework for liberation. 4th US edition The Albert
Einstein Institute, May 2010, p. 17, accessed 2/18/11 URL: http://www.aeinstein.org/organizations/org/FDTD.pdf
Wikipedia,
Edmund Burke, accessed 2/20/11 URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke
No comments:
Post a Comment