Thursday, February 21, 2013

Trigo Moreno, 1997


FCA    6/21/97                               

The Meeting began with Mike saying that service is like a pair of shoes, in order to use them, they have to be gotten dirty. In order to serve you have to get into the mud. For the members of the Meeting who didn’t go to Trigo Moreno, Mexico, who didn’t get literally covered with mud, this was a metaphor. That service requires an active participation, getting involved, is not such a remarkable notion. It’s what you have to do. If you want to serve your fellow man, other species or the environment, you have to get out there and do the work.

Service can take many forms. The bottom line commonality is that you are working for something larger than yourself. Rather than pursuing your own personal things, you have compassion for others who are more needy than you and you help them out. Maybe not everyone can serve out of a complete selflessness.  Service meets a deep need to be interconnected and to be a member, to belong.

In the AFSC project in Trigo we dug a lot of mud out of a draw and helped the locals make forms and make a larger cistern for the village water supply. I shoveled a load of mud into Drew’s boot, which precipitated a big mud fight after which many of the young people were entirely covered with mud. A lot of the work involved getting into the water and mud to hammer forms together or place various pipes. In order to complete the work sometimes somebody had to get in the mud and do that stuff.

In between real experience and metaphor about that experience is a zone of imagination where people can plug in their own related experience. One person spoke at Meeting and felt conflict. He was relatively affluent even while living simply. He could see and feel the suffering of people in the world. He raised a doubt: how could he feel happy and content surrounded by such suffering? Is it wrong to be content when others suffer?

A woman then spoke about the story of Buddha, and expanding on the mud metaphor said that you can go in the mud but that doesn’t equal having your own happiness muddied. To serve others in a suffering world doesn’t necessarily imply that one’s own consciousness has to be dragged onto the metaphorical mud. To serve doesn’t mean that you have to reduce yourself to the level of or become identical with the suffering of others. In general the Meeting following our return from Trigo precipitated a very creative and moving testimony. Rather than being a run of the mill popcorn Meeting where people are  responding to the last thing said, this particular Meeting was like a grand improvisation on a theme. The comments held together with a logic and sense that seemed to reinforce the significance of the over all experience for me.

In spite of the revelatory nature of Meeting the members were really responding to our experience as a metaphor and they projected that suffering out there and got a little off track. When we were in the mud it was fun. The villagers were in the mud. Our mud was not the stuff of suffering but of joy and involvement. We were working together to improve their water system and everyone contributed a share of work to that goal. Through working together we gained a commonality which everyone appreciated. There were people in our group who never actually got in the mud but they made it possible for those who did by cooking and taking care of
the home front. For everyone who jumps in the mud there is a network, a group of people behind supporting and doing related tasks.

At Meeting, others spoke of a universal humanity. It is the Quaker idea of there being that of God in every man and revelatory forces  as much at work today as at any other time. Every human is at once the same and different, so when you see another you see yourself. In this way when a person helps another they are serving themselves at the same time by virtue of being able to identify with the universal threads of humanity. Love your brother as you love thyself. At Meeting this idea was expressed as: to love god is to love your brother. This is one of the reasons why Quakers want to get out and do service projects.

Also in Trigo I was impressed by Indolfo’s bull, cow and calf. Ganaderia or livestock ranching is something highly valued in Mexico. You could see that he took very good care of his animals. The animals had a look of contentment and of innocence, a strikingly different appearance than livestock I’ve seen in the USA. I was invited into Adele’s kitchen and remember the hospitality, the warm bread and sweet coffee and the looks of amazement at a real live gringo. They appreciated us helping them out.

In Hermosillo I was impressed by the murals in the Palacio del Gobierno. Depicted in bold color and form was the whole history of Mexico, from the beginning of time, innocence, pre-Colombian civilization, conquest, change, assimilation, birth of the new, revolution, stagnation, lofty ideals and human frailty. The mural ends right by the door to the governors office and there up on the wall is a man faced by the choice to go with a whore or not. Nearby is a set of scales. It couldn’t be more ironic, politicians always torn between fidelity to constituents and big money pay offs.

With Mexicans there is at the same time force and innocence. Mexicans are at once the conqueror and the conquered. They are the ancestors of Cortes and Cuotemoc. In Magdalena people lined up to pray to the patron  St Francis Xavier, (Kino’s patron saint) in the church.  Father Kino’s bones are seen across the square. There is a sense of living history and continuity that is lacking across the border. It is real, you can taste, smell and hear it.

To return to the USA, with the spotless restaurants and impeccably manicured lawns with no one outside socializing lends a feeling of artificiality and pretense. Somehow the USA is just not as real as Mexico. The USA is removed from itself. Where is the sense of history when all is new and plastic? There are  positive aspects of a fatalism born out of generations of poverty. It is the sense of undaunting optimism.  A Mexican friend and I agreed that lo importante es la manera de vivir. The important thing is  how you live.

Actions do speak louder than words. 

No comments:

Post a Comment